top of page

Extended Research - Natasha Macvoy

Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022
Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022

Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022
Mixed media installation with audio for Spike Island Open Studios 2022, dimensions variable

I discovered the artist Natasha Macvoy through Spike Island’s Open Studios. The work she showed as part of the Open Studios was an installation titled, Notes in the margin.  Unfortunately, I could not visit in person, which prompted me to reach out to Natasha. To my delight, she responded and was willing to share her thoughts. This took place over generous email conversations, extracts of which are included below. 

 

Notes in the margin was the basis of our conversation. I thought it was a beautiful work, the sort of work I wish I had made. This installation felt like it accomplished all the layered aspects I wanted within my own works, in potential subject matter, material language, and visual display/presentation. 

 

In particular, I was interested in the reference to the body. Skeletal structures littered her works; the objects felt like lived experiences might be held within them. Also, her use of colours filled entire wall spaces and became something immersive. 

Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022

Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022.

Mixed media installation, dimensions variable

Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022

The following blue and pink texts highlight extracts of our email correspondence. 

Macvoy, N. (2022) Email correspondence, email to Michaela D’Agati 09 – 28 May. 

​

Michaela: The body feels present in your works, even though it is not necessarily explicit. 

Natasha: I agree - I’m not sure how much any of us can escape our bodies, however hard we try!

M: Is the body an important feature of your work?

N: I definitely think through my body. I’m a conceptual sculptor, so I use all aspects of my body in the making of my work, whatever medium results - I think of writing, parenting, drawing - everything as sculpting. Because I cannot escape my body, I work backwards and forwards through it - excavating it and using it to perform for me.

On my journey as a parent and an artist, I’ve researched neuroplasticity and the central nervous system with a particular interest in Dr Stephen PorgesPolyvagal Theory.

​I had never considered the body as something to escape or to leave behind in my practice, and I thought this was an interesting reflection. In Natasha’s response, I believe it to feel as though her working through the body is, in a sense resigning to it. A realisation is perhaps that there is no other way than through it, so it is necessarily drawn into the conversation. 

I never saw it from this perspective, and I merit its truth, but it has made me realise an important distinction in my thinking. I have no desire to escape the body or to think of my relationship to making as a consequence of having a body. I am trying to get closer to it and give it more presence. It is not the resultant; it is the thing. 

 

I found Natasha’s comment on ‘everything is sculpting’ fascinating because, to me, everything is drawing. As in my tutorial with Marsha Bradfield (24/05/22), it has prompted this idea about the threshold of sculpture or the threshold of drawing. What do these expressions enable or disable? 

A response to which both I and Natasha are yet to give. 

​

A work popped up frequently amongst her installations – the form of a shoulder blade and a story she had posted on Instagram that went with it. 

'A few years ago, a lump was removed from my shoulder using local anaesthetic. The lump was made of sugars my body had been unable to process and neatly deposited there. I was awake for the procedure but also doubled as a table for surgical equipment as the doctor asked me to lie on my front and covered my body, leaving only the lump exposed. Out of sight, I listened to their conversation aware that they lost sight of me completely until mid-flow they stopped abruptly and changed the subject. 

​

Hidden from view silently listening to them.'

M: I am interested to know what it was about having gone through that experience that made you want to make sense of it through your work. What about it was so important that it was carried through into your making?

And do you feel that translating something of this experience into visuals, an artistic practice, has been successful? Did you struggle with that at all? 

N: In 2019, I made Groping in the dark (documentation on my website) - an installation that was inspired by a device called The BrainPort, which allows a non-sighted person to see using their tongue. It is our brains that see, not our eyes - they are just the organ best suited for the activity of looking. The installation made use of the space it was in to look like a climbing wall, except the holds were parts of my body cast in resin and Himalayan salt. At the time, I made a cast of my shoulder but did not use it in that show, but I always recycle my work into itself - it’s continually evolving and revolving!

In 2020 I got my studio at Spike Island, where there’s a communal kiln, and that’s when I began making ceramics, and the shoulder has become a motif. I also use the activity of making ceramics to write - as I push and pull clay into shapes, I write notes next to me - the repetitive action of making is distracting enough to get my overly busy brain into a quiet enough space to get the words out…I do not set out to make certain things or write about certain memories, but I accumulate both and then sculpturally edit them into exhibitions.

​

Natasha highlighted a fascinating area of research I had never heard of - The Brain Port. This has given me a direction to head beyond Unit 2, which I am excited about. I want to scope out how this technology works and if I can get in contact with someone involved in this area of visual aids. 

 

I asked Natasha this question because I felt like there was a relationship she had between the experience and the work she made relating to her shoulder was conveyed so poignantly, which isn’t something I have realised in my own works yet relating to my laryngoscopy. Natasha responded that ‘time will tell how it shows up in your work’. 

I think this made me realise that this whole business of practising art is a long process. Being on this MA gives this false sense of foreshortening it like everything has to be resolved now within the time span of this course. It is a constant process of evolution; from making that shoulder cast in 2019, it did not appear in works until 2020. Sometimes it takes time for things to move through you. 

It is about this idea of accumulation, especially in that, like my own process, it is not one singular work that Natasha shows but a gathering of materials, a mulling of materials. This made me realise that the actual subject matter (in my case, the laryngoscopy) is not what it is all about. Yes, this event happened, and yes, it has triggered a response of thinking and making. But things assimilate around the event; they are not the event themselves. It moves forward from the thing and pushes it into a new state. Draw from it, not be it. I do not need to force or labour the fact more than that. 

Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022
Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022

Natasha Macvoy, Notes from the margin, 2022. Mixed media installation, dimensions variable

M: I wondered if you would be able to comment on how you consider your installations and what the audience then brings to this?

N: The audience are the final performers in my work, and I try to present work on many levels. There are different entry points into the work with no hierarchy attached. I cannot predict, nor would I want to steer a singular reading, as the narrative each person brings to the work will influence how they see it. I have multiple stories attached to my pieces, and I try to share observations and pieces of writing that pushes the work open. I want people to bring their stories, but I hope that my work also nudges them to look again. With Notes in the margin, the attached audio was available to hear via a single cup headphone and was also sent out with a small ceramic motif to those who bought it from my series of Alternative Publications - this audio is a 2 min edit of a 20 min script - a different edit would have made different connections.

In life, how you are affects how you experience the world. I think about this whenever I install an exhibition - how people reach the work and the space it is in, how it presents itself and what they go away with all impact their understanding and time with the work.

​

I like the idea that Natasha actively makes many entry points into the work and the fact that there is no hierarchy to that, with no one thinking or thing being more important than another or the sense that something is subsidiary. I think Natasha highlights that an installation is an active thing, with comments like ‘pieces…that push the work open’ or ‘nudges them to look’ in an open-ended way. There is an encouragement for a narrative with the audience, of being and encountering and the connections you can make, and, in that way, it gives the installation a sense of feeling mobile. 

 

For me, this level of real-life and personal communication with an artist who influences my research has added another layer to my core research. It extends it beyond the untouchable areas of theory books or web pages, it is a real connection and therefore more meaningful. It has changed the way I will consider artist research going forward. By making it a generous space for both of us, our communications have led to insights I hadn’t considered before and new territories for considering the body – my own, the body of my work, and the bodies of its audience. 

 

Our lines of communication will stay open, and I hope to stay in touch with Natasha. One thing looking into Natasha’s practice emphasised was noticing the artists she is surrounded by, has exhibited with etc. – they are all artists I am also currently looking at and being influenced by, including Sandra Lane, Lilah Fowler, Sara Barker and Jesse Darling. This showed me that I clearly belong to a current and relevant ‘clan’ and is something very reassuring in being able to contextualise and apply my practice in relation to a wider active field.

​

My observations of Notes in the margin are that she has successfully combined the capability of the repeated motif, the relationship between 2d, 3d and back again. She has combined the space of the wall with 3d forms and gestures with a real sense of humanness hanging around. Not to mention the direct relation to the use of the colour pink. She is achieving a feeling of mobility while the works conversely stay still, that performative aspect is present. Every motif and object is in conversation with the next, precisely considered, yet effortlessly playful. The experience of being within and amongst the works feels important. Despite the fact I have not seen these works in the flesh, I still get this sense of looking and seeing and being with this installation. These are all aspirations that I want for my own works. 

 

I do not expect this to lead to professional opportunities in the future, that was not why I reached out to Natasha. But in terms of building a more personalised network, someone to aspire to and a willingness to stay in touch is more than enough at this current time. For now, it is enough to know that work like the work I want to make is definitely out there, and these are artists I want to rub shoulders with.

Macvoy, N. (2022) Email correspondence, email to Michaela D’Agati 09 – 28 May. 

​

Natasha Macvoy (2022) Natasha Macvoy (online) Available at: https://www.natashamacvoy.com (accessed 01/05/2022)

​

Spike Island (2022) Natasha Macvoy (online) Available at: https://www.spikeisland.org.uk/our-community/studio-artists/natasha-macvoy/ (accessed 01/05/2022) 

​

Axis Web (2022) Natasha Macvoy (online) Available at: https://www.spikeisland.org.uk/our-community/studio-artists/natasha-macvoy/ (accessed 23/05/2022)

​

Her Mit Projects (2020) Her Mit Projects (online) Available at: https://www.hermitprojects.com/about.html (accessed 23/05/2022)

​

Outpost (2021) Outpost Members Show, Natasha Macvoy, Groping in the Dark (online) Available at: https://www.norwichoutpost.org/programme/natashamacvoy (accessed 23/05/2022)

​

Instagram (2022) Natasha Macvoy (online) Available at: https://www.instagram.com/natashamacvoy/ (accessed 01/05/2022)

​

Instagram (2022) Natasha Macvoy, Instagram post (online) Available at: https://www.instagram.com/p/Cbh6ealst_g/ (accessed 01/05/2022)

​

Very Well Mind (2022) What is Neuroplasticity? (online) Available at: https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-brain-plasticity-2794886 (accessed 31/05/2022)

​

Stephen W. Porges PHD (2022) Stephen Porges Polyvagal Theory (online) Available at: https://www.stephenporges.com (accessed 31/05/2022)

​

National Library of Medicine (2011) The polyvagal theory: New insights into adaptive reactions of the autonomic nervous system (online) Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108032/ (accessed 31/05/2022)

​

Christian G. (2012) Paul Bach-y-Rita and Neuroplasticity [online video, YouTube] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s1VAVcM8s8 (accessed 31/05/2022)

© 2022 Michaela D'Agati

bottom of page